# Frequentist Accuracy of Bayesian Estimates

##### Posted on

This note is for Efron’s slide: Frequentist Accuracy of Bayesian Estimates, which is recommended by Larry’s post: Shaking the Bayesian Machine.

In Bayesian Inference, we have

- Parameter: $\mu\in \Omega$
- Observed data: $x$
- Prior: $\pi(\mu)$
- Probability distributions: $\{f_\mu(x),\mu\in\Omega\}$
- Parameter of interest: $\theta = t(\mu)$

then the posterior estimate of $\theta$ is

This form recalls me a more generic form of the conditional expectation.

The usual uninformative prior is Jeffreys’ prior,

where $I(\mu) = \Cov[\nabla_\mu\log f_\mu(x)]$.

But how accurate are the estimates? Then we will consider the frequentist variability of $\E[t(\mu)\mid x]$.

## General Accuracy Formula

- $\mu$ and $x\in\bbR^p$
- $x\sim (\mu, V_\mu)$
*(here I guess $\mu$ is not necessarily the expectation of $x$ according to the following examples, this symbol might want to indicate $x$ is indexed by $\mu$)* - $\alpha_x(\mu)=\nabla_x\log f_\mu(x)$

$\hat E=E[t(\mu)\mid x]$ has gradient
$$
\nabla_xE =\Cov[t(\mu), \alpha_x(\mu)\mid x]\,.
$$

The delta-method standard deviation of $E$ is
$$
\sd(\hat E) = \left\{\Cov[t(\mu),\alpha_x(\mu)\mid x]'V_x\Cov[t(\mu),\alpha_x(\mu)\mid x]\right\}^{1/2}\,.
$$

## Implementation

Suppose we have the posterior sample $\mu_1^*,\ldots,\mu_B^*$, let $t_i^*=t(\mu_i^*)$ and $\alpha_i^*=\alpha_x(\mu_i^*)$, then

it follows that