This note is for Cai, T. T., & Zhang, L. (n.d.). High dimensional linear discriminant analysis: Optimality, adaptive algorithm and missing data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 0(0).
This note is based on Li Zhang, Yuan Li, & Nevatia, R. (2008). Global data association for multi-object tracking using network flows. 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–8.
This note is based on Zhou, T., Sengupta, S., Müller, P., & Ji, Y. (2019). TreeClone: Reconstruction of tumor subclone phylogeny based on mutation pairs using next generation sequencing data. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 13(2), 874–899.
This note is based on Chapter 15 of Wainwright, M. (2019). High-Dimensional Statistics: A Non-Asymptotic Viewpoint (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Last two days, I attended the conference Medicine Meets AI 2019: East Meets West, which help me know more AI from the industrial and medical perspective.
This note is based on Chapter 1 of Lehmann EL, Romano JP. Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006 Mar 30.
Materials from STAT 5030.
In the last lecture of STAT 5030, Prof. Lin shared one of the results in the paper, Neykov, M., Liu, J. S., & Cai, T. (2016). L1-Regularized Least Squares for Support Recovery of High Dimensional Single Index Models with Gaussian Designs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(87), 1–37., or say the start point for the paper—the following Lemma. Because it seems that the condition and the conclusion is completely same with Sliced Inverse Regression, except for a direct interpretation—the least square regression.
This note is based on the Chapter 6 of Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Wainwright, M. (2015). Statistical Learning with Sparsity. 362..
This note is for Smal, I., Meijering, E., Draegestein, K., Galjart, N., Grigoriev, I., Akhmanova, A., … Niessen, W. (2008). Multiple object tracking in molecular bioimaging by Rao-Blackwellized marginal particle filtering. Medical Image Analysis, 12(6), 764–777.
Larry discussed the normalizing constant paradox in his blog.
This note is for Khan, Z., Balch, T., & Dellaert, F. (2004). An MCMC-Based Particle Filter for Tracking Multiple Interacting Targets. In T. Pajdla & J. Matas (Eds.), Computer Vision - ECCV 2004 (pp. 279–290). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
This note is based on Larry’s post, Mixture Models: The Twilight Zone of Statistics.
This post is based on Chapter 7 of Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations, and I wrote R program to reproduce the simulations to get a better understanding.
This note is for Efron’s slide: Frequentist Accuracy of Bayesian Estimates, which is recommended by Larry’s post: Shaking the Bayesian Machine.
Prof. Jon A. WELLNER introduced the application of a new multiplier inequality on lasso in the distinguish lecture, which reminds me that it is necessary to read more theoretical results of lasso, and so this is the post, which is based on Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Wainwright, M. (2015). Statistical Learning with Sparsity. 362.
I happened to read Yixuan’s blog about a question related to the course Statistical Inference, whether two marginal distributions can determine the joint distribution. The question is adopted from Exercise 4.47 of Casella and Berger (2002).
I read the topic in kiytay’s blog: Proximal operators and generalized gradient descent, and then read its reference, Hastie et al. (2015), and write some program to get a better understanding.